From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hendricks v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 14, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00263-RPM (D. Colo. Feb. 14, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00263-RPM

02-14-2012

VIRGINIA HENDRICKS and JACK HENDRICKS, Plaintiffs, v. FARMERS INSURANCE EXCHANGE, Defendant.


Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch


ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR REMAND

Upon consideration of the Plaintiffs' Motion for Remand [6], claiming a lack of showing of the jurisdictional amount under 28 U.S.C. § 1332, it is apparent from the allegations of the complaint and the plaintiffs' counsel's representation to the state court that the jurisdictional amount has been met and it is therefore

ORDERED that the motion to remand is denied.

BY THE COURT:

____________________________

Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge


Summaries of

Hendricks v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Feb 14, 2012
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00263-RPM (D. Colo. Feb. 14, 2012)
Case details for

Hendricks v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:VIRGINIA HENDRICKS and JACK HENDRICKS, Plaintiffs, v. WAL-MART STORES…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Feb 14, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00263-RPM (D. Colo. Feb. 14, 2012)