From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hendricks v. Perdomo

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 14, 2022
22-CV-4919 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2022)

Opinion

22-CV-4919 (RA)

12-14-2022

CAMRON JAY ONEAL HENDRICKS, Plaintiff, v. NELSON E. PERDOMO and ABLN TRUCKING, Defendants.


ORDER

RONNIE ABRAMS, United States District Judge:

It has been reported to the Court that this case has been settled in principle. Accordingly, it is hereby:

ORDERED that the above-captioned action is discontinued without costs to any party and without prejudice to restoring the action to this Court's docket if the application to restore the action is made within thirty (30) days. Any application to reopen this action must be filed within thirty (30) days of this order, and any application filed thereafter may be denied solely on that basis. If the parties seek to have the Court retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, the terms of the agreement must be placed on the public record and “so ordered” by the Court within the same thirty-day period. See Hendrickson v. United States, 791 F.3d 354, 358 (2d Cir. 2015). The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close this case.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hendricks v. Perdomo

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Dec 14, 2022
22-CV-4919 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2022)
Case details for

Hendricks v. Perdomo

Case Details

Full title:CAMRON JAY ONEAL HENDRICKS, Plaintiff, v. NELSON E. PERDOMO and ABLN…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Dec 14, 2022

Citations

22-CV-4919 (RA) (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 14, 2022)