From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hendricks v. C.O. Savage #14511

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 17, 2011
11 Civ. 0620 (LBS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 2011)

Opinion

11 Civ. 0620 (LBS).

October 17, 2011


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


The complaint in the above-captioned case was filed and a summons was issued on January 25, 2011. The 120 day period for service under Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure has now elapsed. Plaintiff, who is proceeding without a lawyer, has not yet provided information to the United States Marshal Service to enable service of process. Plaintiff is hereby notified that if service is not made within the next 60 days, then the lawsuit will be dismissed as to the party or parties not served. Dismissal means that the lawsuit will be over and Plaintiff will recover nothing.

A plaintiff who is relying upon service of process by the United States Marshal has a duty to provide information sufficient to identify and locate each defendant. Further, a plaintiff who has not received confirmation from the United States Marshal that service has been made has a duty to inquire further, for example, by checking the docket sheet and taking steps to ensure that timely service is made.

The Clerk of the Court is directed to issue an amended summons and the Pro Se Office is directed to send Plaintiff a new mailing package including instructions on how to effect proper service of the complaint. Plaintiffs 60-day extension of time for service will begin to run as of the date of the amended summons.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hendricks v. C.O. Savage #14511

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Oct 17, 2011
11 Civ. 0620 (LBS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 2011)
Case details for

Hendricks v. C.O. Savage #14511

Case Details

Full title:KYLE HENDRICKS, Plaintiff, v. C.O. SAVAGE #14511, et al. Defendants

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Oct 17, 2011

Citations

11 Civ. 0620 (LBS) (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 17, 2011)