From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hendricks v. Biter

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 29, 2015
CV 14-03012 FMO (RZ) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2015)

Opinion

          Jesse Hendricks, Petitioner, Pro se, Imperial, CA.

          For M. D. Biter, Warden, Respondent: John Yang, LEAD ATTORNEY, CAAG - Office of Attorney General of California, California Department of Justice, Los Angeles, CA; Scott A Taryle, CAAG - Office of Attorney General, Supervising Deputy Attorney General, Los Angeles, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          FERNANDO M. OLGUIN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Second Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Second Report to which Petitioner has objected. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge. Petitioner shall, no later than May 29, 2015, file a fully exhausted First Amended Petition. Failure to file the First Amended Petition by May 29, 2015, shall result in the action being dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Hendricks v. Biter

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Apr 29, 2015
CV 14-03012 FMO (RZ) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2015)
Case details for

Hendricks v. Biter

Case Details

Full title:JESSE HENDRICKS, Petitioner, v. M.D. BITER, WARDEN, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Apr 29, 2015

Citations

CV 14-03012 FMO (RZ) (C.D. Cal. Apr. 29, 2015)