The issuance of a protective order under these provisions requires proof of the allegations of the petition by a preponderance of the evidence. La.Ch.C. art. 1569(B) and (D); Hendrick v. Hendrick, 42, 566 (La.App.2d Cir. 8/22/07), 964 So.2d 454. We find no merit to Berry's argument that Newton had to prove the allegations of the petition for protection from abuse by clear and convincing evidence.