From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hendrick v. Frank B. Bishop

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 4, 2016
640 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2016)

Opinion

No. 15-7745

04-04-2016

LARNELL HENDRICK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FRANK B. BISHOP, NBCI Warden, in their individual and official capacities; LIEUTENANT SAWYERS, in their individual and official capacities; SERGEANT G. FORNEY, in their individual and official capacities; CO II SOLTAS, in their individual and official capacities; CO II ANDERSON, in their individual and official capacities; BILL BEEMAN, NBCI Medical Director, in their individual and official capacities; DR. AVA JOUBERT, M.D.; WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., Defendants - Appellees.

Larnell Hendrick, Appellant Pro Se. Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale, Maryland; Ankush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Theodore D. Chuang, District Judge. (8:14-cv-02544-TDC) Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Larnell Hendrick, Appellant Pro Se. Gina Marie Smith, MEYERS, RODBELL & ROSENBAUM, PA, Riverdale, Maryland; Ankush Nayar, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Larnell Hendrick seeks to appeal the district court's order resolving several of Hendrick's claims in this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) action. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2012), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2012); Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The order Hendrick seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we grant the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED


Summaries of

Hendrick v. Frank B. Bishop

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Apr 4, 2016
640 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2016)
Case details for

Hendrick v. Frank B. Bishop

Case Details

Full title:LARNELL HENDRICK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. FRANK B. BISHOP, NBCI Warden…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Apr 4, 2016

Citations

640 F. App'x 259 (4th Cir. 2016)