From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hendler v. Meadows

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1936
183 A. 214 (N.J. 1936)

Opinion

Submitted October 25, 1935 —

Decided January 31, 1936.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose opinion is printed in 13 N.J. Mis. R. 684.

For the respondents, Louis Spiegel and Emanuel Ehrenkranz.

For the appellants, McCarter English.


The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CASE, BODINE, HEHER, PERSKIE, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, WOLFSKEIL, RAFFERTY, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

Hendler v. Meadows

Court of Errors and Appeals
Jan 31, 1936
183 A. 214 (N.J. 1936)
Case details for

Hendler v. Meadows

Case Details

Full title:FANNIE HENDLER ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. ROSE MEADOWS ET AL., APPELLANTS

Court:Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Jan 31, 1936

Citations

183 A. 214 (N.J. 1936)
183 A. 214

Citing Cases

Cermak v. Hertz Corp.

Such a holding is not unknown, however. In the case of Hendler v. Meadows, 13 N.J. Misc. 684; affirmed,…

Burr v. Metropolitan Distributors, Inc.

To the contrary, directed verdicts for plaintiffs in negligence cases have been previously upheld by this…