From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hendler Murray v. Lambert

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 25, 1986
67 N.Y.2d 831 (N.Y. 1986)

Opinion

Decided March 25, 1986

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, John S. Lockman, J.

Robert G. Post for appellant.

David Blasband for respondent.


On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.4 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.4), order modified, with costs to appellant, by deleting so much thereof as provided that Hendler Murray, P.C., exists as the alter ego of its predecessor partnership and is liable for the debts and obligations thereof, and substituting a provision that Hendler Murray, P.C., is a proper party to the arbitration proceeding in view of its adoption of the rights and obligations owing to respondent Arthur Lambert pursuant to the 1976 partnership agreement of the Hendler Murray partnership and any written modification thereof and, as so modified, order affirmed. The extent to which Hendler Murray, P.C., is liable to Lambert for debts and obligations of the predecessor partnership is a question to be settled by arbitration.

Concur: Chief Judge WACHTLER and Judges MEYER, SIMONS, KAYE, ALEXANDER, TITONE and HANCOCK, JR.


Summaries of

Hendler Murray v. Lambert

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Mar 25, 1986
67 N.Y.2d 831 (N.Y. 1986)
Case details for

Hendler Murray v. Lambert

Case Details

Full title:HENDLER MURRAY, P.C., Appellant, v. ARTHUR LAMBERT, Respondent. (And…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Mar 25, 1986

Citations

67 N.Y.2d 831 (N.Y. 1986)
501 N.Y.S.2d 645
492 N.E.2d 773

Citing Cases

WALKER v. WALSAM EMP LLC

Constructive notice means that the dangerous condition was visible and apparent and that it existed for a…

TNS Holdings, Inc. v. MKI Sec. Corp.

Indeed, unless the parties have subscribed to an arbitration agreement it would be "unfair to infer such a…