From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henderson v. VRM

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jun 5, 2014
NO. 02-13-00308-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 5, 2014)

Opinion

NO. 02-13-00308-CV

06-05-2014

ADRIAN HENDERSON APPELLANT v. VRM (VENDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT FOR THE SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS.) APPELLEE


FROM COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND JUDGMENT

On May 9, 2014, we notified appellant that his brief had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a). See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant's brief has not been filed, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

PER CURIAM PANEL: GABRIEL, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and DAUPHINOT, J.

See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.


Summaries of

Henderson v. VRM

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Jun 5, 2014
NO. 02-13-00308-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 5, 2014)
Case details for

Henderson v. VRM

Case Details

Full title:ADRIAN HENDERSON APPELLANT v. VRM (VENDOR RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, DULY…

Court:COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

Date published: Jun 5, 2014

Citations

NO. 02-13-00308-CV (Tex. App. Jun. 5, 2014)