From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henderson v. Raemisch

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Jun 19, 2009
09-cv-170-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 19, 2009)

Opinion

09-cv-170-bbc.

June 19, 2009


ORDER


On April 1, 2009, I denied plaintiff Titus Henderson's request to proceed in forma pauperis under § 1915(g), finding that he was not in imminent danger at the time he filed this lawsuit. I allowed him until April 22, 2009 to pay the filing fee in the amount of $350. Because plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee, his case was closed on April 29, 2009. On May 27, 2009, I denied his motion for reconsideration of the April 1 order.

Now before the court is plaintiff's notice of appeal. Because he has not paid the $455 fee for filing a notice of appeal, I construe the notice as including a request for leave to proceedin forma pauperis on appeal. I must deny that request because plaintiff has struck out under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and has not shown that he is in imminent danger of serious physical injury.

Because I am certifying plaintiff's appeal as not having been taken in good faith, plaintiff cannot proceed with his appeal without prepaying the $455 filing fee unless the court of appeals gives him permission to do so. Pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 24, plaintiff has 30 days from the date of this order in which to ask the court of appeals to review this court's denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. His motion must be accompanied by an affidavit as described in the first paragraph of Fed.R.App.P. 24(a), including a statement of issues that plaintiff intends to present on appeal. Also plaintiff's motion must be accompanied by a copy of this order. Plaintiff should be aware that these documents should be filed in addition to the notice of appeal he has previously filed. If plaintiff does not file a motion requesting review of this order, the court of appeals may not address this court's denial of leave to proceedin forma pauperis on appeal. Instead, it will require plaintiff to pay the entire $455 filing fee before it considers his appeal. If plaintiff fails to pay the fee within the deadline set, it is possible that the court of appeals will dismiss the appeal and order this court to arrange for collection of the fee from plaintiff's prison account.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, dkt. #5, is DENIED. I certify that plaintiff's appeal is not taken in good faith. The clerk of court is directed to insure that plaintiff's obligation to pay the $455 fee for filing his appeal is reflected in the court's financial record.


Summaries of

Henderson v. Raemisch

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Jun 19, 2009
09-cv-170-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 19, 2009)
Case details for

Henderson v. Raemisch

Case Details

Full title:TITUS HENDERSON, Plaintiff, v. RICK RAEMISCH, PETER HUIBREGTSE, GARY…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Jun 19, 2009

Citations

09-cv-170-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 19, 2009)