From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henderson v. Moran

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

April, 1932.


Order denying motion to intervene as a party defendant reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, with leave to appellant to answer within twenty days from the entry of the order herein. Appellant seeks to intervene as a party defendant in a foreclosure action upon the ground that subsequent to the filing of the lis pendens it docketed a judgment which became a lien subject to that of the mortgage lien against the premises sought to be foreclosed. Under such circumstances, appellant was a person interested in the real property which may be affected by the judgment in the foreclosure action. Under subdivision 3 of section 193 of the Civil Practice Act the court below had no discretion. It was bound to permit appellant to intervene. Lazansky, P.J., Young, Scudder, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Amd. by Laws of 1923, chap. 250. — [REP.


Summaries of

Henderson v. Moran

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

Henderson v. Moran

Case Details

Full title:JULIA V. HENDERSON, Respondent, v. MABEL MORAN and Others, Defendants…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 1, 1932

Citations

235 App. Div. 818 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Citing Cases

United Cent. Bank v. Vernon Rlty. Holding, LLC

To the extent Singer and River East claim to be judgment creditors, they docketed their judgment against the…