From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henderson v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 19, 2019
Case No. 2:18-cv-05390-MWF-KES (C.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2019)

Opinion

Case No. 2:18-cv-05390-MWF-KES

07-19-2019

CARLTON HENDERSON, Petitioner, v. L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING AMENDED REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition (Dkt. 1), the other records on file herein, and the Amended Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Dkt. 31). Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections (Dkts. 34) have been made. The Court accepts the report, findings, and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Grounds One and Three are dismissed without prejudice as unexhausted. DATED: July 19, 2019

/s/_________

MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Henderson v. Montgomery

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 19, 2019
Case No. 2:18-cv-05390-MWF-KES (C.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2019)
Case details for

Henderson v. Montgomery

Case Details

Full title:CARLTON HENDERSON, Petitioner, v. L. MONTGOMERY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 19, 2019

Citations

Case No. 2:18-cv-05390-MWF-KES (C.D. Cal. Jul. 19, 2019)