From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henderson v. Liggin

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 18, 2008
300 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-6613.

Submitted: October 23, 2008.

Decided: November 18, 2008.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:07-cv-00227-CMC).

Lamont Henderson, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina; Vinton D. Lide, Lide Pauley, LLC, Lexington, South Carolina; David Leon Morrison, Davidson Lindemann, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Before MICHAEL and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Lamont Henderson appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Henderson v. Liggin, No. 3:07-ev-00227-CMC, 2008 WL 1766674 (D.S.C. Apr. 11, 2008). We further deny Henderson's motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Henderson v. Liggin

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 18, 2008
300 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

Henderson v. Liggin

Case Details

Full title:Lamont HENDERSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. P. LIGGIN, Federal Correctional…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 18, 2008

Citations

300 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2008)

Citing Cases

Henderson v. Liggin

Lamont HENDERSON, petitioner, v. P. LIGGIN, et al.Case below, 300 Fed.Appx. 214. Petition for writ of…