rejecting similar voluntariness claim because there was "no evidence . . . of any promise by the [police] Chief" and emphasizing that "[a]ny indirect promise to be inferred from the . . . remark is so slight as to be insignificant . . ."
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. LeahyNo. 85-6856.
June 23, 1986.
Sup. Ct. Idaho. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 110 Idaho 308, 715 P. 2d 978.
rejecting similar voluntariness claim because there was "no evidence . . . of any promise by the [police] Chief" and emphasizing that "[a]ny indirect promise to be inferred from the . . . remark is so slight as to be insignificant . . ."
Summary of this case from Commonwealth v. LeahyFull title:HENDERSON v. IDAHO ET AL
Court:U.S.
Date published: Jun 23, 1986
nburgh, 488 U.S. 1039 (1989) (same); Wrenn v. Bowen, 488 U.S. 1028 (1989) (same); Wrenn v. Commissioner, 486…
U.S. v. WhiteThe central question is: "whether the will of the defendant [was] overborne so that the statement was not his…