From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henderson v. Fenwick Protective Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 2, 2015
No. 3:14-CV-505-M (N.D. Tex. Sep. 2, 2015)

Opinion

No. 3:14-CV-505-M

09-02-2015

ERIK HENDERSON, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. FENWICK PROTECTIVE INC., ET AL., Defendants.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The United States Magistrate Judge made Findings, Conclusions, and a Recommendation in this case on August 10, 2015. See Dkt. No. 45. No objections were filed. The District Court reviewed the proposed Findings, Conclusions, and Recommendation for plain error. Finding none, the Court ACCEPTS the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge.

Defendant Robert Fenwick is in default. The Court directs the Clerk of Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a), to enter default against Defendant Robert Fenwick. Defendants' Original Answer to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint Answer [Dkt. No. 7] shall be stricken as to Defendant Robert Fenwick. Plaintiff must move, by no later than a date 30 days from the date of this Order, for default judgment against Defendant Robert Fenwick.

SO ORDERED this 2nd day of September, 2015.

/s/ _________

BARBARA M. G. LYNN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS


Summaries of

Henderson v. Fenwick Protective Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION
Sep 2, 2015
No. 3:14-CV-505-M (N.D. Tex. Sep. 2, 2015)
Case details for

Henderson v. Fenwick Protective Inc.

Case Details

Full title:ERIK HENDERSON, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. FENWICK PROTECTIVE INC., ET AL.…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS DALLAS DIVISION

Date published: Sep 2, 2015

Citations

No. 3:14-CV-505-M (N.D. Tex. Sep. 2, 2015)

Citing Cases

Schiff v. Ward

Thus, the record warrants a finding of willful misconduct and bad faith. See Henderson v. Fenwick Protective,…