Opinion
Argued October 23, 1934 —
Decided January 10, 1935.
On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam opinion is printed in 11 N.J. Mis. R. 651.
For the appellant, Robert Henderson.
For the respondents, Leo F. Reilly.
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — THE CHANCELLOR, CHIEF JUSTICE, PARKER, CASE, BODINE, DONGES, PERSKIE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, WELLS, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.