Opinion
2:21-cv-0280-JAD-NJK
04-18-2023
Rhodney Henderson, et al., Plaintiffs v. Aria Resort & Casino Holdings, LLC, et al., Defendants
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
[ECF Nos. 80, 84]
Jennifer A. Dorsey U.S. District Judge
Plaintiffs brought a belated motion for leave to file a third amended complaint, and the magistrate judge recommends that I deny it because it was brought “well after the case management deadline for doing so” and the plaintiffs failed to establish good cause to modify the scheduling order. The deadline for the plaintiffs to object to that recommendation passed without objection or a request to extend the deadline to file one. “[N]o review is required of a magistrate judge's report and recommendation unless objections are filed.” Having reviewed the report and recommendation, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do.
ECF No. 80.
ECF No. 84.
Schmidt v. Johnstone, 263 F.Supp.2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003); see also Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003).
IT IS ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation [ECF No. 84] is ADOPTED and the motion for leave to amend [ECF No. 80] is DENIED.