From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henderson v. Agame

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 2, 2021
1:20-cv-00635-NE-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2021)

Opinion

1:20-cv-00635-NE-JLT (PC)

06-02-2021

GARY DELMAR HENDERSON, Plaintiff, v. G. AGAME, Defendant.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDER 14-DAY DEADLINE

JENNIFER L. THURSTON, CHIEF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On March 9, 2021, the Court issued an order finding service of Plaintiff's complaint appropriate and directing e-service on Defendant Agame. (Doc. 17.) The Court directed the California Attorney General's Office to file a waiver of service of process within 30 days of CDCR's filing of a “Notice of E-Service Waiver.” (Id. at 2.) CDCR filed the notice on April 13, 2021, indicating Defendant Agame's intent to waive service. (Doc. 19.) Although more than 30 days have passed, the Attorney General's Office has not filed a waiver of service.

Accordingly, Defendant shall show cause, within 14 days, why sanctions should not be imposed for failure to comply with the Court's order. Alternatively, within that same time, the Attorney General's Office may file a waiver of service of process on behalf of Defendant Agame.

The Court directs the Clerk of the Court to serve this order via email on Supervising Deputy Attorney General Lawrence Bragg.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Henderson v. Agame

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Jun 2, 2021
1:20-cv-00635-NE-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2021)
Case details for

Henderson v. Agame

Case Details

Full title:GARY DELMAR HENDERSON, Plaintiff, v. G. AGAME, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 2, 2021

Citations

1:20-cv-00635-NE-JLT (PC) (E.D. Cal. Jun. 2, 2021)