Hendershot v. N.Y., S. W.R.R. Co.

Full title: JAMES HENDERSHOT, RESPONDENT, v. NEW YORK, SUSQUEHANNA AND WESTERN…

Court: Court of Errors and Appeals

Date published: Feb 7, 1928

140 A. 919 (N.J. 1928)

140 A. 919

Opinion

Argued October 25, 1927 —

Decided February 7, 1928.

On appeal from the Supreme Court, whose per curiam is printed in 5 N.J. Mis. R. 727.

For the respondent, William C. Gebhardt Son.

For the appellant, Hobart Minard.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — PARKER, MINTURN, KALISCH, BLACK, KATZENBACH, LLOYD, WHITE, VAN BUSKIRK, KAYS, HETFIELD, DEAR, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.