From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Henckles v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2011
Case No.: 1:11-at-00633 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:11-at-00633

10-24-2011

ANDREW S. HENCKLES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS


(Docs. 4, 5)

Plaintiff Andrew S. Henckels filed a complaint on October 7, 2011, along with an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. An amended application to proceed in forma pauperis was filed on October 24, 2011. Plaintiff's applications demonstrate entitlement to proceed without prepayment of fees.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

1. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED;
2. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to issue a summons; and
3. The United States marshal is DIRECTED to serve a copy of the complaint, summons, and this order upon the defendant as directed by the plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Henckles v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Oct 24, 2011
Case No.: 1:11-at-00633 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)
Case details for

Henckles v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW S. HENCKLES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Oct 24, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 1:11-at-00633 (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2011)