From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hempstead Res. Recovery v. Long Isl. Lighting

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 14, 1982
91 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

December 14, 1982


Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Evans, J.), entered July 30, 1982 denying petition to stay arbitration of Claim No. 2 in respondent's demand to arbitrate is affirmed, with costs. Although the formula for fixing damages is styled a penalty in the agreement between the parties, that designation is not dispositive. (See Truck Rent-A-Center v Puritan Farms 2nd, 41 N.Y.2d 420, 425.) When the provision is considered in light of the facts established in this record, it is apparent that the formula represented a reasonable estimate by the parties at the time they entered into their agreement for fixing the injury that would be sustained as a result of a breach. Accordingly, we agree with Special Term that the provision in question was one for "liquidated damages", and does not violate public policy.

Concur — Sandler, J.P., Carro, Lynch and Milonas, JJ.


Summaries of

Hempstead Res. Recovery v. Long Isl. Lighting

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Dec 14, 1982
91 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Hempstead Res. Recovery v. Long Isl. Lighting

Case Details

Full title:HEMPSTEAD RESOURCES RECOVERY CORP., Appellant, v. LONG ISLAND LIGHTING…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Dec 14, 1982

Citations

91 A.D.2d 542 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

In re West 56th Street Associates

Under New York law, the way in which parties characterize a provision in a contract that provides for a…