From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hemphill v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Mar 15, 2022
645 S.W.3d 549 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. ED 109426

03-15-2022

John HEMPHILL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Defendant/Respondent.

Edward S. Thompson, 1010 Market St. Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Appellant. Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent.


Edward S. Thompson, 1010 Market St. Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Appellant.

Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent.

Before Philip M. Hess, P. J., Angela T. Quigless, J., and Colleen Dolan, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM. John Hemphill appeals the judgment denying his Rule 27.26 motion for post-conviction relief. The motion court's findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. We affirm.

An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hemphill v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.
Mar 15, 2022
645 S.W.3d 549 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Hemphill v. State

Case Details

Full title:John HEMPHILL, Movant/Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION THREE.

Date published: Mar 15, 2022

Citations

645 S.W.3d 549 (Mo. Ct. App. 2022)