Hemphill v. State

Full title: James HEMPHILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Five.

Date published: Sep 4, 2012

377 S.W.3d 613 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 97023.

2012-09-4

James HEMPHILL, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Steven R. Ohmer, Judge. Caroline Austin, Cape Girardeau, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis, Steven R. Ohmer, Judge.
Caroline Austin, Cape Girardeau, MO, for appellant. Chris Koster, Attorney General, Dora A. Fichter, Asst. Atty. Gen., Jefferson City, MO, for respondent.
Before GARY M. GAERTNER, JR., C.J., MARY K. HOFF, J., and ROBERT M. CLAYTON III, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James J. Hemphill appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We find that the motion court did not clearly err in denying Hemphill's claim for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).