From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hemphill v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 7, 1996
914 S.W.2d 805 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

No. 67683.

December 5, 1995. Motion for Rehearing and/or Transfer to Supreme Court Denied February 7, 1996.

APPEAL FROM MISSOURI CIRCUIT COURT, CITY OF ST. LOUIS; ROBERT H. DIERKER, JR., JUDGE.

Dave Hemingway, Public Defender, St. Louis, for appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Attorney General, Becky Owneson Kilpatrick, Assistant Attorney General, Jefferson City, for respondent.

Before REINHARD, P.J., KAROHL and DOWD, JJ.


ORDER


Movant appeals the motion court's judgment denying his motion for Rule 24.035 relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Hemphill v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One
Feb 7, 1996
914 S.W.2d 805 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

Hemphill v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALLEN HEMPHILL, MOVANT/APPELLANT, v. STATE OF MISSOURI…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division One

Date published: Feb 7, 1996

Citations

914 S.W.2d 805 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996)