From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hemphill v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Sep 2, 1987
510 So. 2d 1390 (La. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-789.

July 22, 1987. Rehearing Denied September 2, 1987.

Guidry, J., would grant.

Appeal from the 28th Judicial District Court, Parish of LaSalle, Jimmie C. Peters, District Judge, Presiding.

Mayer, Smith Roberts, Caldwell Roberts and Vicki C. Warner, Shreveport, for defendants-appellants.

McKinley O'Neal, Hodge O'Neal, III, Monroe, Joiner Joiner, Charles E. Joiner, West Monroe, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Before DOMENGEAUX, GUIDRY and FORET, JJ.



For the reasons set forth in the matter entitled Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. James Hemphill, et al., 510 So.2d 1386 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1987), in which a separate decision is being rendered this day, the judgment of the district court, in favor of the plaintiffs, is affirmed. All costs of this appeal are assessed against Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, the defendant-appellant.

AFFIRMED.

GUIDRY, J., dissents for the reasons assigned in Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. James Hemphill, et al., 510 So.2d 1386 (La.App. 3rd Cir. 1987).


Summaries of

Hemphill v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit
Sep 2, 1987
510 So. 2d 1390 (La. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Hemphill v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES HEMPHILL, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLEES, v. LIBERTY MUTUAL…

Court:Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Third Circuit

Date published: Sep 2, 1987

Citations

510 So. 2d 1390 (La. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hemphill

After trial, the district court rendered judgment declaring that the Liberty Mutual policy provides coverage…