From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hemphill v. Aramark Corp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 20, 2014
582 F. App'x 151 (4th Cir. 2014)

Opinion

No. 14-1326

08-20-2014

ERIC HEMPHILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ARAMARK CORPORATION; ARAMARK CAMPUS SERVICES LLC, Defendants - Appellees, and ARAMARK, INC., Defendant.

Eric Hemphill, Appellant Pro Se. Kaiser H. Chowdhry, William J. Delany, MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opini


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Ellen L. Hollander, District Judge. (1:12-cv-01584-ELH) Before MOTZ, SHEDD, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Eric Hemphill, Appellant Pro Se. Kaiser H. Chowdhry, William J. Delany, MORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Eric Hemphill appeals the district court's order granting summary judgment to the Appellees and dismissing his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, while we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Hemphill v. Aramark Corp., No. 1:12-cv-01584-ELH (D. Md. filed Mar. 25, 2014; entered Mar. 26, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Hemphill v. Aramark Corp.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Aug 20, 2014
582 F. App'x 151 (4th Cir. 2014)
Case details for

Hemphill v. Aramark Corp.

Case Details

Full title:ERIC HEMPHILL, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. ARAMARK CORPORATION; ARAMARK…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Aug 20, 2014

Citations

582 F. App'x 151 (4th Cir. 2014)