From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hemmingway v. Town of Dannemora

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 9, 1945
269 App. Div. 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Opinion

May 9, 1945.


Plaintiff secured a verdict against both defendants in this action in negligence to recover for his personal injuries. Thereafter the trial court, as to the defendant Town, set the verdict aside and dismissed the complaint. Defendant-appellant herein appeals from the judgment against him entered upon the verdict and orders of the Trial Term which denied his motions to dismiss the complaint and also to set aside the verdict and for a new trial. The proofs presented sharp questions of fact as to the negligence of said defendant and plaintiff's freedom from contributory negligence. The verdict upon those issues is sufficiently supported by evidence. The fairness of the trial questioned by the trial court's disposition of the action as to the codefendant is rendered academic by our decision in plaintiff's appeal therefrom, decided herewith. (See Hemmingway v. Town of Dannemora, ante, p. 221.) Orders and judgment appealed from affirmed, with costs. All concur.


Summaries of

Hemmingway v. Town of Dannemora

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 9, 1945
269 App. Div. 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)
Case details for

Hemmingway v. Town of Dannemora

Case Details

Full title:EDGAR HEMMINGWAY, Respondent, v. TOWN OF DANNEMORA, Defendant, and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 9, 1945

Citations

269 App. Div. 798 (N.Y. App. Div. 1945)

Citing Cases

Cottingham v. State of NY

ed, the above-recited provision of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1103 (b) and the previously recited provision…

Cottingham v. State

) and the previously recited provision of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 Veh. Traf. (e) were essentially…