From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hemmelweit v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 14, 1917
75 So. 961 (Ala. 1917)

Opinion

5 Div. 636.

June 14, 1917.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Russell County; J. S. Williams, Judge.

Glenn De Graffenried and H. A. Ferrell, all of Seale, and Howard Seay, of New York, for appellants. W. L. Martin, Atty. Gen., and P. W. Turner, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


A majority of the court, including Justices McClellan, Sayre, Gardner, and Thomas, are of the opinion that the absence of initial jurisdiction by reason of the failure of any search warrant to designate for search the premises on which these liquors were found and seized was cured by the actual seizure and actual presence of the liquors before the court. Being contraband and outlawed — a fact apparent to the court — it was proper for the trial court to execute the sentence of the statute, without regard to the defect mentioned, even though it were conceded that such a defect would be fatal to a proceeding against lawful property.

These cases were submitted with the case of Ben Edmunds v. State, 74 So. 965, and, all other questions here presented having been there decided adversely to appellant, the judgments herein must be affirmed.

199 Ala. 555.

Affirmed.

McCLELLAN, SAYRE, GARDNER, and THOMAS, JJ., concur. ANDERSON, C. J., and MAYFIELD and SOMERVILLE, JJ., dissent.


Summaries of

Hemmelweit v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jun 14, 1917
75 So. 961 (Ala. 1917)
Case details for

Hemmelweit v. State

Case Details

Full title:HEMMELWEIT v. STATE ex rel. DEDGE. PORTER et al. v. SAME

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jun 14, 1917

Citations

75 So. 961 (Ala. 1917)
200 Ala. 203

Citing Cases

State v. Butler

Only the Attorney General or an attorney employed by him with approval of the Governor can represent the…