From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heltz v. Barratt

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 28, 2014
115 A.D.3d 1302 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)

Opinion

2014-03-28

Mary T. HELTZ, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Bruce S. BARRATT and Erie Logistics, LLC, Defendants–Respondents. (Appeal No. 2.).

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John M. Curran, J.), entered March 26, 2013 in a personal injury action. The order denied plaintiff's motion for leave to reargue and renew her opposition to defendants' summary judgment motion. Personius Melber LLP, Buffalo (Scott R. Hapeman of Counsel), for Plaintiff–Appellant. Barth Sullivan Behr, Buffalo (Andrew J. Kowalewski of Counsel), for Defendants–Respondents.


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (John M. Curran, J.), entered March 26, 2013 in a personal injury action. The order denied plaintiff's motion for leave to reargue and renew her opposition to defendants' summary judgment motion.
Personius Melber LLP, Buffalo (Scott R. Hapeman of Counsel), for Plaintiff–Appellant. Barth Sullivan Behr, Buffalo (Andrew J. Kowalewski of Counsel), for Defendants–Respondents.

Same Memorandum as in Heltz v. Barratt ( [Appeal No. 1], 115 A.D.3d 1298, ––– N.Y.S.2d ––––, 2014 WL 1258261 [Mar. 28, 2014] ).

It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal from the order insofar as it denied leave to reargue is unanimously dismissed and the order is affirmed without costs. CENTRA, J.P., PERADOTTO, LINDLEY, SCONIERS, and WHALEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Heltz v. Barratt

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.
Mar 28, 2014
115 A.D.3d 1302 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
Case details for

Heltz v. Barratt

Case Details

Full title:Mary T. HELTZ, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Bruce S. BARRATT and Erie…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, New York.

Date published: Mar 28, 2014

Citations

115 A.D.3d 1302 (N.Y. App. Div. 2014)
115 A.D.3d 1302
2014 N.Y. Slip Op. 2162