From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Helton v. Spearman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 5, 2018
No. 2:17-cv-01694 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2018)

Opinion

No. 2:17-cv-01694 CKD P

06-05-2018

RICHARD J. HELTON Plaintiff, v. MARION E. SPEARMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

By order filed August 30, 2017, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Following four extensions of time, plaintiff still has not filed an amended complaint. Plaintiff has consented to this court's jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Local Rule 302.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a district court judge be randomly assigned to this action.

IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned "Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations." Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: June 5, 2018

/s/_________

CAROLYN K. DELANEY

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 12/helt1694.fta.docx


Summaries of

Helton v. Spearman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 5, 2018
No. 2:17-cv-01694 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2018)
Case details for

Helton v. Spearman

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD J. HELTON Plaintiff, v. MARION E. SPEARMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 5, 2018

Citations

No. 2:17-cv-01694 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 5, 2018)