Opinion
CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-77 (WLS)
11-13-2012
ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed September 27, 2012. (Doc. 86). It is recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 80) be denied. (Doc. 86 at 1). No objections were filed within the fourteen-day period provided pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The objection period expired on October 11, 2012. (See Doc. 86 at 1; Docket).
Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said Report and Recommendation (Doc. 86) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 80) is DENIED.
________________________
THE HONORABLE W. LOUIS SANDS ,
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT