From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Helton v. Burks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION
Nov 13, 2012
CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-77 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 13, 2012)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-77 (WLS)

11-13-2012

RANDY HELTON, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT BURKS, et al. Defendants.


ORDER

Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Thomas Q. Langstaff, filed September 27, 2012. (Doc. 86). It is recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 80) be denied. (Doc. 86 at 1). No objections were filed within the fourteen-day period provided pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The objection period expired on October 11, 2012. (See Doc. 86 at 1; Docket).

Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that said Report and Recommendation (Doc. 86) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 80) is DENIED.

________________________

THE HONORABLE W. LOUIS SANDS ,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT


Summaries of

Helton v. Burks

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION
Nov 13, 2012
CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-77 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 13, 2012)
Case details for

Helton v. Burks

Case Details

Full title:RANDY HELTON, Plaintiff, v. SERGEANT BURKS, et al. Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA ALBANY DIVISION

Date published: Nov 13, 2012

Citations

CASE NO.: 1:11-CV-77 (WLS) (M.D. Ga. Nov. 13, 2012)