From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Helmsley v. Anderson Clayton Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 23, 1978
61 A.D.2d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)

Opinion

March 23, 1978


Motion, insofar as it seeks resettlement, granted only to the extent of (1) amending the memorandum decision of this court [ 60 A.D.2d 808] to provide at the end of the first paragraph thereof as follows: "Findings of fact below with respect to the claim for attorneys' fees have not been passed upon by this Court" and (2) resettling the order of this court entered on January 5, 1978 accordingly. In all other respects the motion for resettlement is denied. The motion, insofar as it seeks leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals is denied. Resettled order signed and filed.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Silverman, Lane and Markewich, JJ.


Summaries of

Helmsley v. Anderson Clayton Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Mar 23, 1978
61 A.D.2d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)
Case details for

Helmsley v. Anderson Clayton Co.

Case Details

Full title:HARRY B. HELMSLEY, Doing Business as SOUTH WALL VENTURE, Respondent, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Mar 23, 1978

Citations

61 A.D.2d 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1978)