From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Helm-Bell v. City of Moline Acres

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Jan 17, 2012
356 S.W.3d 883 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)

Opinion

No. ED 96709.

2012-01-17

Allean HELM–BELL, Appellant, v. CITY OF MOLINE ACRES and Division of Employment Security.

Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.Allean Helm–Bell, St. Louis, MO, Appellant pro se. City of Moline Acres, St. Louis, MO, Respondent pro se.


Appeal from the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission.Allean Helm–Bell, St. Louis, MO, Appellant pro se. City of Moline Acres, St. Louis, MO, Respondent pro se. Jeannie D. Mitchell, Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.Before ROBERT G. DOWD, JR. P.J. and MARY K. HOFF and SHERRI B. SULLIVAN, JJ.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Allean Helm–Bell (“Claimant”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“the Commission”) denying her petition for unemployment benefits. Claimant argues the Commission erred in finding she committed misconduct by bringing a visitor into a restricted area.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).


Summaries of

Helm-Bell v. City of Moline Acres

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.
Jan 17, 2012
356 S.W.3d 883 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)
Case details for

Helm-Bell v. City of Moline Acres

Case Details

Full title:Allean HELM–BELL, Appellant, v. CITY OF MOLINE ACRES and Division of…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three.

Date published: Jan 17, 2012

Citations

356 S.W.3d 883 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012)