From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hellman v. Manning Sand Paper Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 28, 1916
176 App. Div. 127 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)

Opinion

December 28, 1916.

Jeremiah F. Connor, for the appellants.

Egburt E. Woodbury, Attorney-General [ E.C. Aiken, Deputy Attorney-General, of counsel], and Robert W. Bonynge, counsel for the State Industrial Commission, for the respondents.


The claimant's employer was engaged in the manufacture of sand paper, which was a hazardous employment. The claimant was employed as a night man at the manufacturing plant. His duties were to watch the premises against the danger of fire, and to protect them against the commission of depredations to keep the furnaces under the boiler supplied with coal, and to pour glue into the vats. In the evening of August 1, 1915, while standing upon the front platform of the employer's plant, two men came thereon. Upon being asked by the claimant what they wanted, they said, "Nothing," but thereupon assaulted the claimant, took a small sum of money from his pocket and while the struggle was going on between the claimant and one of the men, the other entered the factory and stole the claimant's dinner pail. In the struggle the claimant was thrown down the steps of the platform and sustained the injuries for which the award complained of was made.

The employer reported that the claimant was injured in the course of his employment. Two at least of the claimant's duties, those of firing the boiler and keeping the vats supplied with glue, were directly connected with carrying on the employer's business. The claimant was engaged in a hazardous employment in the service of an employer carrying on and conducting the same upon the premises, hence he was an employee within the meaning of the Workmen's Compensation Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 67 [Laws of 1914, chap. 41], § 3, subd. 4), and entitled to compensation for accidental injuries arising out of and in the course of his employment. He was injured at his employer's plant while endeavoring to protect it from depredation by violence which he encountered as an incident of his occupation.

I think the award should be affirmed.

Award unanimously affirmed.


Summaries of

Hellman v. Manning Sand Paper Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 28, 1916
176 App. Div. 127 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
Case details for

Hellman v. Manning Sand Paper Co.

Case Details

Full title:Before STATE INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION, Respondent. In the Matter of the Claim…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 28, 1916

Citations

176 App. Div. 127 (N.Y. App. Div. 1916)
162 N.Y.S. 835

Citing Cases

Spang v. Broadway Brewing Malting Co.

An injury caused deliberately and willfully by a third party may be an "accidental injury" within the meaning…

Fisher v. Halliburton

FN33. SeeN.Y. Workers' Comp. Law § 2(7) (defining “injury” as “only accidental injuries arising out of and in…