From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hellman v. Hellman

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Jun 23, 1988
543 A.2d 307 (Conn. App. Ct. 1988)

Opinion

(6249)

Submitted on briefs June 3, 1988

Decision released June 23, 1988

Action for the dissolution of a marriage, and for other relief, brought to the Superior Court in the judicial district of Stamford-Norwalk where the court, Hauser, J., granted the plaintiff's motion for alimony and child support pendent lite and the defendant appealed to this court. No error.

Vicky D. Henry and Paul Martin Tymniak filed a brief for the appellant (defendant).

Gaetano Ferro filed a brief for the appellee (plaintiff).


The defendant appeals from the trial court's pendente lite awards of alimony and child support.

The defendant contends that the trial court erred (1) in finding that it had jurisdiction over the defendant, and (2) in ruling on the plaintiff's motion for alimony and support, pendente lite, without a showing of a substantial change in circumstances.

Neither claim of error has merit. The defendant was personally served in Connecticut and our review of the record, transcript and briefs clearly indicates that the trial court properly exercised its broad discretion and fashioned its awards in conformity with applicable law.


Summaries of

Hellman v. Hellman

Appellate Court of Connecticut
Jun 23, 1988
543 A.2d 307 (Conn. App. Ct. 1988)
Case details for

Hellman v. Hellman

Case Details

Full title:GILA HELLMAN v. MORDECAI HELLMAN

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut

Date published: Jun 23, 1988

Citations

543 A.2d 307 (Conn. App. Ct. 1988)
15 Conn. App. 816