Opinion
March 17, 1998
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Arber, J.).
We have reviewed the petition de novo as if it had been properly transferred ( see, Matter of Jimenez v. Popolizio, 180 A.D.2d 590), and find that it is supported by substantial evidence. We reject petitioner's argument that waste cannot be present for storage within the meaning of 16 RCNY 8-02 absent a finding of enough waste to fill a single leak-tight container, it being sufficient for purposes of showing a violation of that regulation that waste was present for more than one working day. We have considered petitioner's other arguments and find them to be without merit.
Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Rosenberger and Andrias, JJ.