From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heller Erhmann LLP v. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Aug 31, 2016
S236208 (Cal. Aug. 31, 2016)

Opinion

S236208

08-31-2016

HELLER ERHMANN LLP v. DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP


Request for certification granted

The court grants the request, made pursuant to California Rules of Court, rule 8.548, that this court decide a question of California law presented in a matter pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Pursuant to rule 8.548(f)(5) of the California Rules of Court, this court restates the certified question as follows: Under California law, what interest, if any, does a dissolved law firm have in legal matters that are in progress but not completed at the time the law firm is dissolved, when the dissolved law firm had been retained to handle the matters on an hourly basis?

For the purposes of briefing and oral argument, appellant Heller Ehrman, LLP is deemed the petitioner in this court. (Cal. Rules of Court, rule 8.520(a)(6).)

Werdegar, J., was recused and did not participate.

Votes: Cantil-Sakauye, C. J., Chin, Corrigan, Liu, Cuéllar, and Kruger, JJ.


Summaries of

Heller Erhmann LLP v. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

California Supreme Court(Minute Order)
Aug 31, 2016
S236208 (Cal. Aug. 31, 2016)
Case details for

Heller Erhmann LLP v. Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Case Details

Full title:HELLER ERHMANN LLP v. DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP

Court:California Supreme Court(Minute Order)

Date published: Aug 31, 2016

Citations

S236208 (Cal. Aug. 31, 2016)