From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Helland v. St. Mary's Duluth Clinic Health System

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 5, 2010
Civil No. 10-31 (RHK/RLE) (D. Minn. Feb. 5, 2010)

Opinion

Civil No. 10-31 (RHK/RLE).

February 5, 2010


ORDER


Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and no objections having been filed thereto, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 6) is ADOPTED;

2. The Clerk of Court shall not issue a Summons, nor deliver process to the United States Marshal for service upon the Defendant, until so directed by further Order of the Court; and

3. Plaintiff's application for in forma pauperis status (Doc. No. 2) is DENIED.


Summaries of

Helland v. St. Mary's Duluth Clinic Health System

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Feb 5, 2010
Civil No. 10-31 (RHK/RLE) (D. Minn. Feb. 5, 2010)
Case details for

Helland v. St. Mary's Duluth Clinic Health System

Case Details

Full title:Randy L. Helland, Plaintiff, v. St. Mary's Duluth Clinic Health System…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Feb 5, 2010

Citations

Civil No. 10-31 (RHK/RLE) (D. Minn. Feb. 5, 2010)

Citing Cases

Windsor v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

In addition to considering an individual IFP applicant's monthly income, federal courts have consistently…

Winans v. Soc. Sec. Admin.

Rather, the relevant question is “whether the court costs can be paid without undue hardship.” Id. All of the…