From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Helean v. Hawley

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 14, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1162 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2007)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-1162 LKK EFB P.

August 14, 2007


ORDER


Plaintiff is a prisoner without counsel seeking relief for alleged civil rights violations. See 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 28, 2007, defendant Hawley, the sole defendant in this action, filed a motion for summary judgment. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56. Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or a statement of no opposition.

In cases in which one party is incarcerated and proceeding without counsel, motions ordinarily are submitted on the record without oral argument. Local Rule 78-230(m). "Opposition, if any, to the granting of the motion shall be served and filed with the Clerk by the responding party not more than eighteen (18) days, plus three (3) days for mailing or electronic service, after the date of service of the motion." Id. A responding party's failure "to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion and may result in the imposition of sanctions." Id. Furthermore, a party's failure to comply with any order or with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court." Local Rule 11-110. The court may recommend that an action be dismissed with or without prejudice, as appropriate, if a party disobeys an order or the Local Rules. See Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1252 (9th Cir. 1992) (district court did not abuse discretion in dismissing pro se plaintiff's complaint for failing to obey an order to re-file an amended complaint to comply with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988) (dismissal for pro se plaintiff's failure to comply with local rule regarding notice of change of address affirmed);

On January 3, 2007, the court advised plaintiff of the requirements for filing an opposition to a motion for summary judgment, that failure to oppose such a motion may be deemed a waiver of opposition to the motion, and that failure to comply with the Local Rules may result in a recommendation of dismissal.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that, within 20 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file either an opposition to the motion for summary judgment or a statement of no opposition. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice.


Summaries of

Helean v. Hawley

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 14, 2007
No. CIV S-06-1162 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2007)
Case details for

Helean v. Hawley

Case Details

Full title:THOMAS V. HELEAN, Plaintiff, v. M. D. D. HAWLEY, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 14, 2007

Citations

No. CIV S-06-1162 LKK EFB P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 14, 2007)