From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Helder v. Wiesel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 28, 1937
251 App. Div. 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

May 28, 1937.


In an action to recover for injuries to person and property arising out of a collision between two automobiles, judgment in favor of plaintiffs reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event. In view of the conflicting claims as to how the collision occurred, it was error to exclude testimony, offered by defendants, as to the nature and extent of the damage to plaintiff Harry Helder's automobile. Davis, Adel and Close, JJ., concur; Hagarty and Johnston, JJ., dissent and vote to affirm.


Summaries of

Helder v. Wiesel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 28, 1937
251 App. Div. 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Helder v. Wiesel

Case Details

Full title:EDWARD HELDER, JULIA HELDER, an Infant over Fourteen Years of Age, by…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 28, 1937

Citations

251 App. Div. 747 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)