From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Held v. Held

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 19, 1991
170 A.D.2d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)

Opinion

February 19, 1991

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.).


The IAS court's finding that an award of exclusive possession to plaintiff was necessary to protect the best interests of the child of the marriage was based on the presence of extreme domestic strife caused by defendant's repeated physical and verbal attacks on plaintiff (Delli Venneri v Delli Venneri, 120 A.D.2d 238). Although plaintiff's hearing testimony was contradicted in part by defendant, we find that the record contains sufficient credible evidence to justify an award of temporary exclusive possession to plaintiff, and provides no basis for any interference with the court's sound exercise of its discretion based upon its evaluation of the testimony before it. The remedy here is a speedy trial.

Concur — Carro, J.P., Ellerin, Wallach, Kupferman and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

Held v. Held

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 19, 1991
170 A.D.2d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
Case details for

Held v. Held

Case Details

Full title:BOHUNKA O. HELD, Respondent, v. PETER HELD, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 19, 1991

Citations

170 A.D.2d 310 (N.Y. App. Div. 1991)
566 N.Y.S.2d 32