Held v. Held

Full title: BOHUNKA O. HELD, Respondent, v. PETER HELD, Appellant

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 8, 1994

201 A.D.2d 301 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

608 N.Y.S.2d 835

Opinion

February 8, 1994

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Walter M. Schackman, J.).

We perceive no abuse of discretion in the reinstatement of the temporary maintenance award, and reiterate that "the proper remedy of a party who thinks that temporary support payments ordered are excessive * * * is to press for an early trial" (Dreyfus v. Dreyfus, 72 A.D.2d 522). We have considered defendant's remaining contentions and find them to be without merit.

Concur — Ellerin, J.P., Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.