From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hejazi v. Eugene Mun. Court

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Sep 15, 2021
314 Or. App. 622 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

A175373

09-15-2021

Hamid Michael HEJAZI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EUGENE MUNICIPAL COURT and City of Eugene, Defendants.

Hamid Michael Hejazi filed the brief pro se.


Hamid Michael Hejazi filed the brief pro se.

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and Kamins, Judge.

PER CURIAM As allowed under ORS 19.205(2), and explained in Stanwood v. Multnomah County , 135 Or. App. 58, 60, 898 P.2d 196 (1995), plaintiff appeals an order denying his request for a waiver or deferral of filing fees and sheriff's service fees. Plaintiff's opening brief, however, contains no argument, and we affirm for that reason. See Smith v. Dept. of Corrections (A170818) , 314 Or. App. 1, ––– P3d –––– (2021) (affirming denial of fee waiver where the appellant's brief contained no pertinent argument).

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hejazi v. Eugene Mun. Court

Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Sep 15, 2021
314 Or. App. 622 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Hejazi v. Eugene Mun. Court

Case Details

Full title:Hamid Michael HEJAZI, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EUGENE MUNICIPAL COURT and…

Court:Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Date published: Sep 15, 2021

Citations

314 Or. App. 622 (Or. Ct. App. 2021)
495 P.3d 753