From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heitmuller v. Berkow

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Feb 6, 1947
51 A.2d 302 (D.C. 1947)

Opinion

No. 450.

February 6, 1947.

Appeal from the Municipal Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Division.

Vincent A. Sheehy, Jr., of Washington, D.C. (Arthur C. Elgin, of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellant.

Sidney M. Goldstein, of Washington, D.C., for appellee.

Before CAYTON, Chief Judge, and HOOD and CLAGETT, Associate Judges.


Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Municipal Court awarding plaintiff $210, covering double the amount of excess rent collected by defendant in violation of the District of Columbia Emergency Rent Act, (Code 1940, 45-1610) together with an attorney's fee of $50.

The only question on this appeal is whether the claim was barred by the one-year limitation as an action "for a statutory penalty or forfeiture." That question we have today decided adversely to appellant's contention in Shenk v. Cohen, D.C.Mun.App., 51 A.2d 298. Consequently, the judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Heitmuller v. Berkow

Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia
Feb 6, 1947
51 A.2d 302 (D.C. 1947)
Case details for

Heitmuller v. Berkow

Case Details

Full title:HEITMULLER v. BERKOW

Court:Municipal Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia

Date published: Feb 6, 1947

Citations

51 A.2d 302 (D.C. 1947)