From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heit v. Penn Dental Med.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 29, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-2929 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 29, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-2929

11-29-2017

MARSHA SILVER HEIT v. PENN DENTAL MEDICINE, TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA, DANA T. GRAVES, D.D.S., DENIS F. KINANE, B.D.S.


ORDER GRANTING SUMMARY JUDGMENT

AND NOW, this 29th day of November 2017, after review of the Motion for Summary Judgment submitted by Defendants Penn Dental Medicine, Trustees of the University of Pennsylvania, Dana T. Graves, and Denis F. Kinane, (ECF 85), and for the reasons stated in the accompanying memorandum, it is hereby ORDERED that Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. Plaintiff's motion for relief pursuant to Rule 56(d)(2) (ECF 99) is DENIED. All other pending motions are DENIED as moot.

The Complaint is therefore DISMISSED with prejudice.

BY THE COURT:

/s/ Michael M. Baylson

MICHAEL M. BAYLSON, U.S.D.J. O:\CIVIL 16\16-2929 Heit v Penn Dental\16cv2929 Order Granting Summary Judgment.doc


Summaries of

Heit v. Penn Dental Med.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 29, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-2929 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 29, 2017)
Case details for

Heit v. Penn Dental Med.

Case Details

Full title:MARSHA SILVER HEIT v. PENN DENTAL MEDICINE, TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 29, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 16-2929 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 29, 2017)