From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heinzen v. Bell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)

Opinion

March, 1935.

Present — Hill, P.J., Rhodes, McNamee, Bliss and Heffernan, JJ.


Plaintiff was struck by an automobile; he suffered injury to his hip and to his elbow. The extent of these injuries was in sharp conflict between the doctors. The doctor who examined him immediately after the accident and the following day found mere abrasions and superficial injuries. There was a question of fact for the jury as to the extent of these injuries. Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs.


Summaries of

Heinzen v. Bell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 1, 1935
243 App. Div. 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)
Case details for

Heinzen v. Bell

Case Details

Full title:JOSEPH H. HEINZEN, Appellant, v. FRED BELL, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1935

Citations

243 App. Div. 826 (N.Y. App. Div. 1935)