From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heinze v. Superior Transport Co.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, W.D
Dec 6, 1950
96 F. Supp. 479 (N.D. Ohio 1950)

Opinion

Civ. No. 6359.

December 6, 1950.

Marshall, Melhorn, Bloch Belt, Toledo, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

Zachman, Boxell Torbet, Toledo, Ohio, Smith, Klein Blumberg, Toledo, Ohio, for defendant.


The motion of the defendant for an order requiring a more definite statement of the claim of plaintiff is overruled as to all specifications therein.

It appears to the Court that the complaint fairly and fully discloses a cause of action, and that the matters inquired into in the motion more properly constitute evidence that may become known to the defendant through the application of one or more of the methods of discovery provided in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A.

An order is drawn accordingly.


Summaries of

Heinze v. Superior Transport Co.

United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, W.D
Dec 6, 1950
96 F. Supp. 479 (N.D. Ohio 1950)
Case details for

Heinze v. Superior Transport Co.

Case Details

Full title:HEINZE et al. v. SUPERIOR TRANSPORT CO

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, W.D

Date published: Dec 6, 1950

Citations

96 F. Supp. 479 (N.D. Ohio 1950)