From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heinz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 24, 2000
758 So. 2d 743 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)

Opinion

No. 3D99-1940.

Opinion filed May 24, 2000.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Stanford Blake, Judge, L.T. No. 90-45486.

Frank Heinz, in proper person.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Darien M. Doe, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and GODERICH, JJ., and NESBITT, Senior Judge.


We affirm the trial court's denial of the defendant's petition for writ of mandamus. Although the petitioner alleged that he was entitled to copies of his transcript from his specially-appointed public defender, he nevertheless filed the petition against the wrong party, the State. This affirmance is without prejudice for the petitioner to refile his petition against the proper party, his specially-appointed public defender.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Heinz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 24, 2000
758 So. 2d 743 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)
Case details for

Heinz v. State

Case Details

Full title:FRANK HEINZ, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 24, 2000

Citations

758 So. 2d 743 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2000)