From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Heinz v. Serban

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 2004
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50453 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)

Opinion

2003-1432 QC.

Decided May 20, 2004.

Appeal by defendants from an order of the Small Claims Part of the Civil Court, Queens County (D. Butler, J.), entered June 16, 2003, denying their motion to "modify/vacate" an arbitrator's award and restore the case to the calendar.

Order unanimously affirmed without costs.

PRESENT: ARONIN, J.P., PATTERSON and GOLIA, JJ.


The court below properly rejected defendants' proffer of new evidence to support their assertion that they did not cause the damage plaintiff claimed, as newly discovered evidence is not a basis upon which an arbitration award may be vacated or modified ( see CPLR 7511 [b], [c]; see also Matter of Blamowski, 91 NY2d 190, 194 [award may be vacated or modified only on grounds specified by CPLR 7511]; Matter of Central Gen. Hosp. v. Hanover Ins. Co., 49 NY2d 950 [new evidence not enumerated as ground for vacatur]). Defendants make no claim that the arbitrator exhibited bias, exceeded his powers or otherwise engaged in misconduct (CPLR 7511 [b]) and cite no other grounds upon which relief may be granted ( see Rymer v. Leider, 122 Misc 2d 873 [Civ Ct, Queens County 1983]).


Summaries of

Heinz v. Serban

Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
May 20, 2004
2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50453 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)
Case details for

Heinz v. Serban

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN P. HEINZ, Respondent, v. MARIA SERBAN and JOHN SERBAN, Appellants

Court:Appellate Term of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: May 20, 2004

Citations

2004 N.Y. Slip Op. 50453 (N.Y. App. Term 2004)

Citing Cases

HEMLALL v. NGO

Plaintiff commenced this small claims action seeking to recover for property damage allegedly sustained in an…