Opinion
Civil Action No. 12-cv-335-AP
05-03-2012
JONATHAN HEINY Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant.
For Plaintiff: Hull & Zimmerman, P.C. Michael P. Zimmerman, Esq. For Defendant: Jessica Milano, Esq. Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration APPROVED: Original signature on file at the office Of Hull & Zimmerman, P.C. UNITED STATES ATTORNEY Original signature on file at the Office of the General Counsel HULL & ZIMMERMAN, P.C. MICHAEL P. ZIMMERMAN Attorneys for Plaintiff By: JESSICA MILANO Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration Attorneys for Defendant
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
Hull & Zimmerman, P.C.
Michael P. Zimmerman, Esq.
For Defendant:
Jessica Milano, Esq.
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Assistant Regional Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed:
February 8, 2012
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney's Office:
February 13, 2012
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed:
April 13, 2012
4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The record is adequate.
5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
No additional evidence is anticipated.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
This matter does not involve any unusual claims or defenses.
7. OTHER MATTERS
Not applicable.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A. Plaintiff's Opening Brief Due:
June 8, 2012
B. Defendant's Response Brief Due:
July 9, 2012
C. Plaintiff's Reply Brief (If Any) Due:
July 24, 2012
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiff's Statement:
Plaintiff believes that an oral argument would be appropriate.
B. Defendant's Statement:
Please note that Defendant does not request oral argument.
10. CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
A. () All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
B. (×) All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
11. OTHER MATTERS
12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
BY THE COURT:
John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
Original signature on file at the office
Of Hull & Zimmerman, P.C.
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
Original signature on file at the Office of
the General Counsel
____________
HULL & ZIMMERMAN, P.C.
MICHAEL P. ZIMMERMAN
Attorneys for Plaintiff
____________
By: JESSICA MILANO
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Assistant Regional Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
Attorneys for Defendant